CONNECTING GLOBALLY, ADVANCING ALONGSIDE THE FUTURE

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) of Metal Materials

TIME: 2025-05-24 SOURCE: Ruisen

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) is a critical technology for assessing the internal and surface integrity, properties, and structure of metal components—without causing any damage. It plays a vital role across high-stakes industries such as aerospace, mechanical engineering, pressure vessels, and rail transit. Below is an overview of the most common NDT methods, their principles, and typical applications.


I. Core NDT Methods

1. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

  • Principle:      Uses high-frequency sound waves (>20kHz) to detect internal flaws. An      ultrasonic probe sends sound into the material, and defects reflect the      waves back for signal analysis.

  • Best      for: All types of metals (steel, aluminum, copper), especially      thick-walled components such as forgings, castings, and weld seams.

  • Detects:      Internal cracks, inclusions, porosity, delaminations—especially sensitive      to planar flaws.

  • Pros:      Deep penetration, high sensitivity, fast and cost-effective. Suitable for      automation (e.g., phased array UT).

  • Cons:      Less effective on complex shapes; requires coupling agent; result      interpretation relies on operator skill.

2. Radiographic Testing (RT)

  • Principle:      Uses X-rays or gamma rays to image internal structures based on material      density variations. Flaws show up as contrast differences on film or      digital sensors.

  • Best      for: Thin-walled welds and pipe joints; effective on all metals.

  • Detects:      Volumetric defects such as porosity, slag inclusions, lack of fusion. Less      sensitive to flat cracks.

  • Pros:      Visual and archivable results; ideal for quantitative analysis.

  • Cons:      Radiation hazard; limited effectiveness on thick sections; slower and more      costly than other methods.

3. Magnetic Particle Testing (MT)

  • Principle:      Applies a magnetic field to ferromagnetic materials; surface or      near-surface defects disrupt the field, creating leakage that attracts      magnetic particles for visible indication.

  • Best      for: Ferromagnetic metals only (carbon and alloy steels).

  • Detects:      Surface and shallow subsurface flaws like cracks, laps, and inclusions      (<2mm depth).

  • Pros:      High sensitivity, simple operation, low cost.

  • Cons:      Limited to ferromagnetic materials; requires surface prep; depth      measurement is difficult.

4. Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT)

  • Principle:      A dye or fluorescent penetrant enters surface-breaking defects via      capillary action. After removing excess, a developer draws the dye out to      reveal flaws.

  • Best      for: Non-porous materials like aluminum, copper, ceramics, plastics.

  • Detects:      Surface-breaking defects (cracks, porosity, folds).

  • Pros:      Easy to use, effective on non-magnetic/non-conductive materials, visually      clear results.

  • Cons:      Only reveals open-surface flaws; sensitive to cleanliness; some chemicals      may be environmentally hazardous.

5. Eddy Current Testing (ET)

  • Principle:      Alternating magnetic fields induce eddy currents in conductive metals.      Defects disturb current flow, altering coil impedance, which is detected.

  • Best      for: Conductive metals (steel, aluminum, copper), particularly in      thin-walled tubes, sheets, and rods.

  • Detects:      Surface and near-surface defects, corrosion, thickness variation. Also      used for alloy sorting and coating thickness.

  • Pros:      Fast, contactless, automation-friendly, great for high-volume screening.

  • Cons:      Limited penetration depth (<3mm); affected by surface roughness and      geometry; signal interpretation can be complex.

6. Other Techniques

  • Visual      Testing (VT): Basic yet essential—uses the naked eye or tools (e.g.,      borescopes) to spot surface flaws, corrosion, and dimensional issues.

  • Acoustic      Emission Testing (AE): Monitors real-time sound waves emitted during      defect growth or pressure-induced damage.

  • Infrared      Thermography (IR): Detects temperature anomalies on surfaces to reveal      defects such as disbonding, cracks, and corrosion—ideal for large-area      scanning.


II. Choosing the Right Method

Factor

Recommended Method

Material Type

Ferromagnetic: MTNon-magnetic: PT, ET

Thickness

Thick: UTThin: RT

Defect Location

Surface: PT, MT, ET, VTInternal: UT, RT, AE

Performance Needs

Highest sensitivity: MT, PTHigh efficiency: ET, UT (for   automation)

Compliance

Methods aligned with ASTM, ASME, GB/T standards


III. Application Scenarios

Industry

Example

Aerospace

Titanium alloy blades: PTAircraft welds: Phased Array UT +   RT

Pressure Vessels

Cylindrical weld seams: UT + RTSurface cracks: MT

Automotive

Gear cracks: MTAluminum wheels: PT

Pipeline Inspection

Corrosion in oil/gas lines: ET, ultrasonic thickness testingButt   welds: RT / UT


At Ruisen Special Steel, we emphasize the importance of accurate, efficient, and standards-compliant NDT processes to ensure product reliability and client trust—especially in mission-critical industries. Whether it's ultrasonic scans for structural components or high-throughput eddy current inspections for production lines, our expertise helps your operations stay safe and compliant.